[1] Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Cho YK, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 812-817. doi:  10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016
[2] Ihdayhid AR, Yong A, Harper R, et al. A practical guide for fractional flow reserve guided revascularisation. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 406-419. doi:  10.1016/j.hlc.2017.09.017
[3] Lotfi A, Jeremias A, Fearon WF, et al. Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography: a consensus statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83: 509-518. doi:  10.1002/ccd.25222
[4] Depta JP, Patel JS, Novak E, et al. Risk model for estimating the 1-year risk of deferred lesion intervention following deferred revascularization after fractional flow reserve assessment. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 509-515. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=94fd2e663b225547229d85891fed398e
[5] Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part Ⅱ. Circulation 2003; 108: 1772-1778. doi:  10.1161/01.CIR.0000087481.55887.C9
[6] Sugiyama T, Yamamoto E, Fracassi F, et al. Calcified plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: 531-540. doi:  10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.013
[7] Johnson TW, Räber L, di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 2566-2584. doi:  10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332
[8] Leone AM, De Caterina AR, Basile E, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 29-36. doi:  10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971101
[9] Shah K, Hou L, Ghosh B, et al. Prognostic significance of non-ischemic FFR (> 0.80) in LAD versus non-LAD lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 1453.
[10] Masrani Mehta S, Depta JP, Novak E, et al. Association of lower fractional flow reserve values with higher risk of adverse cardiac events for lesions deferred revascularization among patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e002172. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1161/JAHA.115.002172
[11] Achenbach S, Rudolph T, Rieber J, et al. Performing and interpreting fractional flow reserve measurements in clinical practice: an expert consensus document. Interv Cardiol 2017; 12: 97-109. doi:  10.15420/icr.2017:13:2