Li-Jin PU, Yu WANG, Lu-Lu ZHAO, Tao GUO, Shu-Min LI, Bao-Tong HUA, Ping YANG, Jun YANG, Yan-Zhou LU, Liu-Qing YANG, Ling ZHAO, Hai-Yun LUO. Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay[J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2017, 14(2): 118-126. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.006
Citation: Li-Jin PU, Yu WANG, Lu-Lu ZHAO, Tao GUO, Shu-Min LI, Bao-Tong HUA, Ping YANG, Jun YANG, Yan-Zhou LU, Liu-Qing YANG, Ling ZHAO, Hai-Yun LUO. Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay[J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2017, 14(2): 118-126. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.006

Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay

  • Objective To evaluate left univentricular (LUV) pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using a rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay (RAAVD) algorithm to track physiological atrioventricular delay (AVD). Methods A total of 72 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) were randomized to RAAVD LUV pacing versus standard biventricular (BiV) pacing in a 1: 1 ratio. Echocardiography was used to optimize AVD for both groups. The effects of sequential BiV pacing and LUV pacing with optimized A-V (right atrio-LV) delay using an RAAVD algorithm were compared. The standard deviation (SD) of the S/R ratio in lead V1 at five heart rate (HR) segments (RS/R-SD5), defined as the “tracking index,” was used to evaluate the accuracy of the RAAVD algorithm for tracking physiological AVD. Results The QRS complex duration (132 ± 9.8 vs. 138 ± 10 ms, P vs. 50 ± 8 min, P vs. 2.5 ± 1.3 cm2, P vs. 68.3 ± 14.2 ms, P vs. 21,600 ± 2000 RMB, P vs. 21.4 ± 2.1 cm, P S/R-SD5 was 4.08 ± 1.91 in the RAAVD LUV pacing group, and was significantly negatively correlated with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (?LVEF, Pearson’s r = ?0.427, P = 0.009), and positively correlated with New York Heart Association class (Spearman’s r= 0.348, P = 0.037). Conclusions RAAVD LUV pacing is as effective as standard BiV pacing, can be more physiological than standard BiV pacing, and can decrease the average annual cost of CRT.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return