Please cite this article as: ZHANG W, YIN YB, WANG ZQ, ZHAO YX, SHI DM, GUO YH, ZHOU ZM, WANG ZJ, YANG SW, JIA DA, YANG LX, ZHOU YJ. Performance assessment of computed tomographic angiography fractional flow reserve using deep learning: SMART trial summary. J Geriatr Cardiol 2025; 22(9): 793−801. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.09.002.
Citation: Please cite this article as: ZHANG W, YIN YB, WANG ZQ, ZHAO YX, SHI DM, GUO YH, ZHOU ZM, WANG ZJ, YANG SW, JIA DA, YANG LX, ZHOU YJ. Performance assessment of computed tomographic angiography fractional flow reserve using deep learning: SMART trial summary. J Geriatr Cardiol 2025; 22(9): 793−801. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.09.002.

Performance assessment of computed tomographic angiography fractional flow reserve using deep learning: SMART trial summary

  • Background  Non-invasive computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) could become a gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography. Deep learning (DL)-based CT-FFR has shown promise when compared to invasive FFR. To evaluate the performance of a DL-based CT-FFR technique, DeepVessel FFR (DVFFR).
    Methods  This retrospective study was designed for iScheMia Assessment based on a Retrospective, single-center Trial of CT-FFR (SMART). Patients suspected of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing both CTA and invasive FFR examinations were consecutively selected from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2016 to December 30, 2018. FFR obtained during invasive coronary angiography was used as the reference standard. DVFFR was calculated blindly using a DL-based CT-FFR approach that utilized the complete tree structure of the coronary arteries.
    Results  Three hundred and thirty nine patients (60.5 ±10.0 years and 209 men) and 414 vessels with direct invasive FFR were included in the analysis. At per-vessel level, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DVFFR were 94.7%, 88.6%, 90.8%, 82.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.95 for DVFFR and 0.56 for CTA-based assessment with a significant difference (P < 0.0001). At patient level, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of DVFFR were 93.8%, 88.0%, 90.3%, 83.0%, and 95.8%, respectively. The computation for DVFFR was fast with the average time of 22.5 ± 1.9 s.
    Conclusions The results demonstrate that DVFFR was able to evaluate lesion hemodynamic significance accurately and effectively with improved diagnostic performance over CTA alone. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a critical disease in which coronary artery luminal narrowing may result in myocardial ischemia. Early and effective assessment of myocardial ischemia is essential for optimal treatment planning so as to improve the quality of life and reduce medical costs.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return