ISSN 1671-5411 CN 11-5329/R
Volume 18 Issue 3
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Please cite this article as: M Verdoia, R Gioscia, G D Luca. Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy strategy in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol 2021; 18(3): 210−218. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.010
Citation: Please cite this article as: M Verdoia, R Gioscia, G D Luca. Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy strategy in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol 2021; 18(3): 210−218. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.010

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy strategy in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.010
More Information
  • One out of three hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) involve nowadays elderly patients, carrying together a significant burden of comorbidities and a higher risk of complications. In particular, both ischemic and haemorrhagic risk are markedly enhanced in advanced age, and strictly interconnected, challenging the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in these patients. The recent development of several therapeutic options in terms of duration and combination of antiplatelet agents have offered a wider spectrum of opportunities for a more individualized approach in the management of DAPT after an ACS, although the criteria for the selection of the most appropriate strategy in each patient still lack validation. In particular, dose-adjustment, early aspirin discontinuation, laboratory-driven tailoring and shorter or extended DAPT have been addressed with promising safety and efficacy results. The present review provides an updated overview on the emerging evidencefrom randomized clinical trials and subanalyses dedicated to the management of DAPT in elderly patients presenting with ACS.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Bortnick AE, Epps KC, Selzer F, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients treated for coronary artery disease in the face of an increasing burden of co-morbidity and disease complexity. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 573−579. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.039
    Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, et al. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 747−762. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.070
    De Luca G, van't Hof AW, Ottervanger JP, et al. Ageing, impaired myocardial perfusion, and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 662−666. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi110
    Kayani WT, Khan MR, Deshotels MR, Jneid H. Challenges and controversies in the management of ACS in elderly patients. Curr Cardiol Rep 2020; 22: 51. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01298-x
    De Luca G, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C, et al. Impact of age on long-term outcome after primary angioplasty with bare-metal or drug-eluting stent (from the DESERT cooperation). Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 181−186. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.012
    De Luca G, van't Hof AW, Huber K, et al. Impact of advanced age on myocardial perfusion, distal embolization, and mortality patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty and glycoprotein Ⅱb-Ⅲa inhibitors. Heart Vessels 2014; 29: 15−20. doi: 10.1007/s00380-013-0323-4
    De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, et al. Comparison between stenting and balloon in elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2007; 119: 306−309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.143
    Savonitto S, Cavallini C, Petronio AS, et al. Early aggressive versus initially conservative treatment in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 906−916. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.008
    Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, et al. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1057−1065. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01166-6
    Morici N, Savonitto S, Biondi-Zoccai G, De Servi S. Invasive management for elderly adults with acute coronary syndrome: where are we now? J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 64: 2396−2397. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14466
    Jones CI. Platelet function and ageing. Mamm Genome 2016; 27(7-8): 358−366. doi: 10.1007/s00335-016-9629-8
    Dayal S, Wilson KM, Motto DG, et al. Hydrogen peroxide promotes aging-related platelet hyperactivation and thrombosis. Circulation 2013; 127: 1308−1316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000966
    Cowman J, Dunne E, Oglesby I, et al. Age-related changes in platelet function are more profound in women than in men. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 12235. doi: 10.1038/srep12235
    Segal JB. Moliterno AR (2006) Platelet counts differ by sex, ethnicity, and age in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 2006; 16: 123−130. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.052
    Verdoia M, Nardin M, Negro F, et al. Impact of aging on immature platelet count and its relationship with coronary artery disease. Platelets 2020; 31: 1060−1068. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1714572
    Verdoia M, Schaffer A, Barbieri L, et al. Impact of age on mean platelet volume and its relationship with coronary artery disease: a single-centre cohort study. Exp Gerontol 2015; 62: 32−36. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.12.019
    Verdoia M, Pergolini P, Nardin M, et al. Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 48: 413−421. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01873-2
    Calabrò P, Moscarella E, Gragnano F, et al. Effect of Body Mass Index on Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the START-ANTIPLATELET Registry). Am J Cardiol 2019; 124: 1662−1668. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.030
    Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001−2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482
    Savonitto S, Ferri LA, Piatti L, et al. Comparison of reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous revascularization. Circulation 2018; 137: 2435−2445. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180
    Elliot Cham B, Dykman JH, Bochner F. Urinary excretion of aspirin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 14: 562−564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb02030.x
    Airoldi G, Campanini M. Prasugrel. Italian Journal of Medicine 2013; 4: 43−50.
    Zhang YJ, Li MP, Tang J, Chen XP. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to clopidogrel: evidences and perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: 301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030301
    De Rosa R, Piscione F, Galasso G, et al. Antiplatelet therapy in very elderly and comorbid patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019; 16: 103−113.
    Zaman MJ, Stirling S, Shepstone L, et al. The association between older age and receipt of care and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a cohort study of the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1551−1558. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu039
    Avezum A, Makdisse M, Spencer F, Gore JM, Fox KA, Montalescot G, Eagle KA, White K, Mehta RH, Knobel E, Collet JP; GRACE Investigators. Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am Heart J 2005; 149(1): 67−73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.003
    Szummer K, Montez-Rath ME, Alfredsson J, et al. Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the SWEDEHEART Registry. Circulation 2020; 142: 1700−1708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050645
    Husted S, James S, Becker RC, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5: 680−688. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964395
    Kaul P, Alexander KP, Ohman EM, et al. Sex and prognostic significance of self-reported frailty in non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the TRILOGY ACS trial. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35: 430−437. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.12.035
    Gimbel M, Qaderdan K, Willemsen L, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 1374−1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1
    Gremmel T, Steiner S, Seidinger D, et al. Adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 37−42. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03644.x
    Silvain J, Cayla G, Hulot JS, Finzi J, et al. High on-thienopyridine platelet reactivity in elderly coronary patients: the SENIOR-PLATELET study. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1241−1249. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr407
    Verdoia M, Pergolini P, Rolla R, et al. Advanced age and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14: 57−64. doi: 10.1111/jth.13177
    Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Storey RF, et al. Platelet reactivity during ticagrelor maintenance therapy: a patient-level data meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2014; 168: 530−536. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.026
    Crimi G, Morici N, Ferrario M, et al. Time course of ischemic and bleeding burden in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to low-dose prasugrel or clopidogrel. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e010956.
    De Luca G, Damen SA, Camaro C, et al. Final results of the randomised evaluation of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with a new-generation stent (REDUCE trial). EuroIntervention 2019; 15: e990−e998. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00539
    Verdoia M, Kedhi E, Suryapranata H, et al. Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 50: 337−354. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-02033-2
    Naber CK, Urban P, Ong PJ, et al. Biolimus-A9 polymer-free coated stent in high bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: a Leaders Free ACS sub-study. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 961−969.
    Varenne O, Cook S, Sideris G, et al. Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 41−50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32713-7
    Kupka D, Sibbing D. De-Escalation of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy after acute coronary syndromes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean Circ J 2018; 48: 863−872. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0255
    Cuisset T, Deharo P, Quilici J, et al. Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: the TOPIC (timing of platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome) randomized study. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 3070−3078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx175
    Sibbing D, Aradi D, Jacobshagen C, et al. Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 1747−1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4
    Claassens DMF, Vos GJA, Bergmeijer TO, et al. A genotype-guided strategy for oral P2Y12 inhibitors in primary PCI. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1621−1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907096
    Cayla G, Cuisset T, Silvain J, et al. Platelet function monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients stented for an acute coronary syndrome (ANTARCTIC): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2015−2022. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X
    Nikolsky E, Stone GW, Kirtane AJ, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes: incidence, predictors, and clinical implications: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1293−1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.019
    Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, et al. Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2032−2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419
    Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, et al. Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs. aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet 2018; 392: 940−949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0
    Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, et al. Effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the TICO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 323: 2407−2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580
    Watanabe H, Domei T, Morimoto T, et al. Effect of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 2414−2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145
    Lopes RD, Heizer G, Aronson R, et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1509−1524. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817083
    Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2423−2434. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611594
    Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2020. Published online first: Aug 29, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
    Montalto C, Crimi G, Morici N, et al. Bleeding risk prediction in elderly patients managed invasively for acute coronary syndromes: External validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS scores. Int J Cardiol 2021; 328: 22−28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.065
    Guerrero C, Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, et al. Applicability of the PRECISE-DAPT score in elderly patients with myocardial infarction. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018; 15: 713−717.
    European Cardiovascular Research Center; (accessed March 22nd 2021).
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌,
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (62) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint